CO129-296 - Public Offices & Others - 1899 — Page 141

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

138

assistant for the Governor of that colony to establish a station for maintaining persons under observation until they had completed the required ten days since they left the last infected port.

Vessels could also be differently dealt with according as they carried a medical officer on board or not.

On the other hand, whilst this or a system of surveillance is permissible in the case of suspected and healthy ships, there is no obligation under the Convention as to either measure or as to duration of surveillance in the case of these two classes of vessels.

The existing "Quarantine Regulations" in Hong Kong dated 10th April, 1897, (Sea Regn. No 6) neither require observation nor surveillance pending the completion of the "10 days"; and adoption of the terms of the Convention would in no way compel the Colonial Government to do more than is contemplated under the existing Code of Regulations.

I do not know how many plague-infected vessels have reached Hong Kong since plague has been prevalent in the East, and therefore I am unable to judge whether it is beyond the capability of the Colony, after dealing with the sick, to arrange for maintaining the Asiatics on board an actually infected vessel under observation for a period not exceeding the Convention limit of 10 days. If they would do this, they would carry out the main thing

Edit History

2026-05-31 14:26:29 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
138 assistant for the Governor of that colony to establish a station for maintaining persons under observation until they had completed the required ten days since they left the last infected port. Vessels could also be differently dealt with according as they carried a medical officer on board or not. On the other hand, whilst this or a system of surveillance is permissible in the case of suspected and healthy ships, there is no obligation under the Convention as to either measure or as to duration of surveillance in the case of these two classes of vessels. The existing "Quarantine Regulations" in Hong Kong dated 10th April, 1897, (Sea Regn. No 6) neither require observation nor surveillance pending the completion of the "10 days"; and adoption of the terms of the Convention would in no way compel the Colonial Government to do more than is contemplated under the existing Code of Regulations. I do not know how many plague-infected vessels have reached Hong Kong since plague has been prevalent in the East, and therefore I am unable to judge whether it is beyond the capability of the Colony, after dealing with the sick, to arrange for maintaining the Asiatics on board an actually infected vessel under observation for a period not exceeding the Convention limit of 10 days. If they would do this, they would carry out the main thing
Baseline (Original)
A 138 sistant for the Governant of that colony to establish a station for maintaining persons under observation until they had completed the requirəd tən days since they left the last infected port. Vessels could also ha differently dealt with according as they carried a medical officar on board or not. either On the other hand, whilst this or a system of surveillanca « permissible in the case of suspected and healthy ships, there is no obligation under the Convention as to aither measure or es to duration of surveillanoA in the case of these two classes of vessels. The existing *Quarantine Romulations" in Hong Kong dated 10th April, 1897, (Sea Rogn. No 6.) naithar require observation nor survaillance panding the completion of the "10 days"; and adoption of the terms of the Convention would in no way compel the Colonial in this rappact Government to do morasthan is contemplated under the existing Code of Regulations. I do not know how many plague-infected vansels have reachad Hong Kong sinca plaque has been prevelant in the Rast, and therefore I en unable to judge whathar it. is beyond the capability of the Colony, after doaling with the sick, to arrange for maintaining the Asiatics on board an actually infected vassal unier observation for a period not exceeding the Convention limit of 10 days., If they would do this, they would carry out the main thing
2026-05-31 14:26:29 · Baseline
View content

A

138

sistant for the Governant of that colony to establish a

station for maintaining persons under observation until

they had completed the requirəd tən days since they left

the last infected port.

Vessels could also ha differently

dealt with according as they carried a medical officar

on board or not.

either

On the other hand, whilst this or a system of

surveillanca « permissible in the case of suspected and

healthy ships, there is no obligation under the Convention

as to aither measure or es to duration of surveillanoA

in the case of these two classes of vessels.

The existing *Quarantine Romulations" in Hong

Kong dated 10th April, 1897, (Sea Rogn. No 6.) naithar

require observation nor survaillance panding the

completion of the "10 days"; and adoption of the terms of

the Convention would in no way compel the Colonial

in this rappact

Government to do morasthan is contemplated under the

existing Code of Regulations.

I do not know how many plague-infected vansels

have reachad Hong Kong sinca plaque has been prevelant in

the Rast, and therefore I en unable to judge whathar it.

is beyond the capability of the Colony, after doaling

with the sick, to arrange for maintaining the Asiatics

on board an actually infected vassal unier observation for a period not exceeding the Convention limit of 10 days., If they would do this, they would carry out the main thing

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.